Skip to main content

Meditations on Corporate Whoredom

Yes, ladies and gentlemen, we've reached the flustered-and-idealistic-grad-student-comes-face-to-face-with-impending-graduation-
and-the-real-world phase of the year. I found this entry, A Corporate Whole in Philadelphia, a few weeks ago on Daily Kos. It reminded me of two things.

The first was a Halloween party my senior year of college where a recent graduate came dressed entirely in white and red (including striped socks), and whenever someone approached her, pulled a Target job application out of her pocket and announced cheerily, "Hi! I'm a Corporate Whore! Would you like to work for Target?" It turns out that this formerly radical lesbian, though still a lesbian, was not so radical anymore, and was actually loving her job as a computer tech at Target headquarters. She'd come to terms with it, and could laugh at it. Still the best Halloween costume I've seen in awhile.


The second was in a planning meeting for the annual May Day Parade in Minneapolis. The room was full of the usual South Minneapolis hippie types, trying to come up with a theme for the 2002 parade. The topic of corporate greed came up, and someone brought up the idea of a businessman in a coffin, surrounded by money. Various supportive leftist sentiments were brought up, until one guy in a Grateful Dead (or Peace Corps, or Sierra Club) t-shirt spoke up and reminded the group that he worked in an office, for a company, and that 'businessman' does not equal 'evil.' Very apt, considering this was, after all, a parade run by the In the Heart of the Beast Theatre Company. Running away to a commune is not going to change the world, as much as I'd like to.

Until I got here, every single friend I knew worked for a nonprofit or government. It never occurred to me that I would ever work for a for-profit company. Where am I going with this... I had an interview yesterday with a defense industry technology company that is way to excited about hiring me. The job doesn't fit what I want to do, so I'm not really debating whether or not to take it, but it's a really, really interesting opportunity that could lead to some high-power jobs. I'm pretty sure I'll be able to balance by values and finding a job, whether for- or non-profit. My point is that yesterday was one of those fork-in-the-road moments, where I saw how large the disconnect there is between an organizing meeting at In the Heart of the Beast, and a lobbying meeting on Capitol Hill. I could end up in either.

Comments

Anonymous said…
hey, that's exciting about the job, though!

Popular posts from this blog

This post was a whole long longer and more emotional an hour ago...

First off: It's sad that I get better wireless reception in my backyard than in my apartment, right? Sigh. I normally try to stay out of the quagmire that is the abortion debate, but as usually, elyzabethe wrote something insightful about feminist issues that I had to comment on. Actually, I had to comment on the framing war that was going on in the comments section between elyzabethe and another friend. Then I ended up emailing back and forth with her for awhile. Then someone at work mentioned how the "choice" frame is starting to lose ground, even though advocates don't want to admit it. I started scribbling notes, sighed, and thought, "well, I'm gonna have to blog about this." Elyzabeth rants often against anti-choice organizations and legislation, as is her wont as a libertarian feminist. She’s particularly good at teasing out how anti-choice (A, if you’re reading this, bear with me, I’m referring to ‘anti-choice’ as more than just the abortion issu...

Obligatory OWS Post

I'll try and expand on this later, but a few links looking at the protest from marketing and demographic standpoints: OWS Demographics  or, "Duh, it's not just unemployed college dropouts" Protest, Music and #OWS Opportunism  or, "Hey, this thing ain't going away. Can we market it?" OWS Billboard?  or, "Really, you think Clear Channel will put this up?" and the Frameworks Institute analyzes the "We are the 99%" meme.
First off, this isn't a post about abortion. It's about how the personhood movement is dangerous even if you take abortion out of the debate. According to my friend Liz, More than 55% of voters in Mississippi yesterday   rejected the state’s  ‘personhood’ initiative —a development that certainly bodes well for reproductive rights in this country, and gives me a little more hope about our collective sanity, as well. What interested me about this issue (aside from the fact that I possess a uterus), was the way some of the groups fighting the Mississippi amendment were approaching the issue. The group  Parents against MS 26  pointed out that the personhood movement , "has far-reaching effects on infertility treatment, contraception, and women's physical health." Jessica Valenti cites several examples in her column in the Washington Post , including this one: In 1996, when Laura Pemberton in Florida refused a recommended C-section because she did not want su...